Shabbat.com, the world’s largest Jewish social network, along the “Be a Mensch Foundation”, was on a mission to find the “Mensch of the Year” and pay that individual $1,000

The Be a Mensch Foundation awarded $1000 to two of Shabbat.com’s most popular families for being amazing hosts!!

The winners were the Beyman and Zahav Family- who have together invited over 4,000 guests.

The goal of the contest was to promote Derech Eretz in our community and to remind hosts that the mizvah does not end with signing up for Shabbat.com. Rather, each week hosts on Shabbat.com have the opportunity to go on to the website and invite guests who may be too bashful to request an invitation.

The Be a Mensch Foundation, which aims to promote better social
behavior among Israelis, was established in 2011 by Moshe Kaplan. Its
advisory board includes three Nobel prizewinners — Professor Dan
Shechtman, Professor Aaron Ciechanover and Professor Robert  Aumann — as
well as former US senator Joe Lieberman, Tova Ben Dov, acting president
of World WIZO, former basketball player Tal Brody, and others.

Congratulations to the winners! Keep on inviting!

www.beamensch.com

11149698_1623613204548601_4896526728750091646_o[1]

Judaism Broadcast Live on the New LiveJudaism.com

LiveJudaism.com celebrates the Jewish people by sharing events from your average Jewish families and neighborhoods Live. LiveJudaism has already broadcast Megilah reading on Purim(the Migilah reader fainted in the middle) Koshering a kitchen for Passover while children sit on the fridge watching A communal burning of the Chametz in New York A wine store in New… Read More …


Hashem.com is a project of Shabbat.com.
It’s purpose is to increase awareness of Hashem in the world through appreciating complexity and design which indicates a master designer.

Here are some of the most famous scientists in history who, through their research and exploration, have come to the same conclusion!

Antony Flew (Professor of Philosophy, former atheist, author, and debater) “It now seems to me that the findings of more than fifty years of DNA research have provided materials for a new and enormously powerful argument to design.”

Fred Hoyle (British astrophysicist): “A common sense interpretation of the facts suggests that a super-intellect has monkeyed with physics, as well as with chemistry and biology, and that there are no blind forces worth speaking about in nature. The numbers one calculates from the facts seem to me so overwhelming as to put this conclusion almost beyond question.”

Alan Sandage (winner of the Crawford prize in astronomy): “I find it quite improbable that such order came out of chaos. There has to be some organizing principle. God to me is a mystery but is the explanation for the miracle of existence, why there is something instead of nothing.”

John O’Keefe (astronomer at NASA): “If the Universe had not been made with the most exacting precision we could never have come into existence. It is my view that these circumstances indicate the universe was created for man to live in.”

George Greenstein (astronomer): “As we survey all the evidence, the thought insistently arises that some supernatural Agency must be involved.

Arno Penzias (Nobel prize in physics): “Astronomy leads us to a unique event, a universe which was created out of nothing, one with the very delicate balance needed to provide exactly the conditions required to permit life, and one which has an underlying (one might say ‘supernatural’) plan.”

Roger Penrose (mathematician and author): “I would say the universe has a purpose. It’s not there just somehow by chance.”

Tony Rothman (physicist): “When confronted with the order and beauty of the universe and the strange coincidences of nature, it’s very tempting to take the leap of faith from science into religion. I am sure many physicists want to. I only wish they would admit it.”

Vera Kistiakowsky (MIT physicist): “The exquisite order displayed by our scientific understanding of the physical world calls for the divine.”

Robert Jastrow (self-proclaimed agnostic): “For the scientist who has lived by his faith in the power of reason, the story ends like a bad dream. He has scaled the mountains of ignorance; he is about to conquer the highest peak; as he pulls himself over the final rock, he is greeted by a band of theologians (Rabbis) who have been sitting there for centuries.”

Frank Tipler (Professor of Mathematical Physics): “When I began my career as a cosmologist some twenty years ago, I was a convinced atheist. I never in my wildest dreams imagined that one day I would be writing a book purporting to show that the central claims of Judeo-Christian theology are in fact true, that these claims are straightforward deductions of the laws of physics as we now understand them. I have been forced into these conclusions by the inexorable logic of my own special branch of physics.”

Ed Harrison (cosmologist): “Here is the cosmological proof of the existence of God — the design argument of Paley — updated and refurbished. The fine tuning of the universe provides prima facie evidence of deistic design. Take your choice: blind chance that requires multitudes of universes or design that requires only one…. Many scientists, when they admit their views, incline toward the teleological or design argument.”

Edward Milne (British cosmologist): “As to the cause of the Universe, in context of expansion, that is left for the reader to insert, but our picture is incomplete without Him [God].”

Barry Parker (cosmologist): “Who created these laws? There is no question but that a God will always be needed.”

Paul Davies (British astrophysicist): “There is for me powerful evidence that there is something going on behind it all….It seems as though somebody has fine-tuned nature’s numbers to make the Universe….The impression of design is overwhelming”.

www.Hashem.com